Crotty & Son Law Firm

Home Attorney News

Stuart v. Vilsack

The case involves representation of a former employee of the United States Department of Agriculture in a disability discrimination, failure to accommodate, and Privacy Act lawsuit. A copy of the complaint is available here. The Court allowed Ms. Stuart to amend her complaint to include a Back Pay Act claim.  A copy of the Amended Complaint is available here.  On November 23, 2016, the Federal District Court partly denied the U.S. Government’s Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissal of Ms. Stuart’s lawsuit. A copy of Ms. Stuart’s summary judgment Response Brief is available as is the Court’s Summary Judgment Order.  On January 20, 2017, the USDA agreed to settle Ms. Stuart’s claim for $305,000.00.


Back to News

Firm News

Washington Army National Guard USERRA Cases

These are two separate cases involving two Washington Army National Guard Soldiers, USERRA, and the ...

Read more

Charles Mayo v. City of Yakima & Ryan Anderson v. City of Yakima

These are two separate cases brought by two former City of Yakima employees.  Ryan Anderson's case ...

Read more

Derek Richter v. Commerce City, Colorado, et. al.

This case involves Derek Richter, a patrol officer with the Commerce City, Colorado Police Departme...

Read more

Zhu v. Bridgeport School District & ESD 171

These cases involve Jin Zhu, a Chinese-American citizen who taught math and science at Waterville ...

Read more

Zandt v. Horizon Hospice, LLC et al

The case involves former employees Nancy Zandt, Heather Holick, Stacy Strong, and Kelli O'Connor ass...

Read more

Osmanski v. Cathay Pacific Airways, LTD

The case involves U.S. Navy Reserve F/A 18 pilot Joshu Osmanski asserting USERRA employment discrimi...

Read more

Munoz v. InGenesis, et al

The case involves plaintiff Vanessa Munoz claiming that joint employers, InGenesis, Inc., STGi In...

Read more

Allman v. American Air Lines Pension Plan, et al

The case involves plaintiff Michael Allman claiming that American Airline's pension plan violates US...

Read more

Burrows, et al v. Auto Credit, et al

The case involved the representation of five former employees of Auto Credit, an auto dealership, in...

Read more